The Treason Trial of Aaron Burr

In the months between and including May and September, in 1807, Aaron take was seek by the Supreme Court in Virginia on the count of falsehood against the United States. During the period of 1804 to 1807, burr all toldegedly committed some(prenominal) clear ventures, which are actions, that may be innocent in themselves, moreover in combi ground with the intentions and results of that act, require criminal actions. The streamlet was almost treason, which the Constitution defines as levying warfare against [the United States], or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort, (Art. III, Sect. 3) and the prosecution must stress that Burr committed the capable act with the certification of 2 witnesses, for the treason conviction to stand. In this trial, Burrs actions outside of the recite of Virginia subscribe to no bearing on the overt act of assemblage serviceman to levy war against the United States, and accordingly the legal age of his admissible actions occurred on Blennerhassets Island in Virginia. (Doc 108) Although the prosecution do a strong case for Burrs guilt, the specialization between his intentions and his actions, his primer cover as an American patriot and the lack of concrete evidence, good sense must conclude that Aaron Burr is not guilty of treason. He perhaps was til now the dupe of a larger semipolitical conspiracy to rid him of all prestige, honor and legacy.

        The prosecution assay to prove that Burr use his power to assemble an troops of men to conquer wise Orleans, then Mexico and even sotually map out a refreshful nation composed of the Western American states and Mexico. The fault in their demarcation is that his actions do not inescapably point directly towards this conclusion. It is adjust that Burr wrote letters and even discussed a red-hot war with Spain and the formation of a new nation, If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper